Current:Home > StocksPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -NextFrontier Finance
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-09 18:33:42
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at [email protected]
veryGood! (995)
Related
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Davante Adams trade grades, winners, losers: Who won between Jets, Raiders?
- 'Locked in:' Dodgers pitching staff keeps rolling vs. Mets in NLCS Game 3
- When does 'Fabulous Lives vs. Bollywood Wives' come out? Season 3 release date, cast
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- How Jose Iglesias’ ‘OMG’ became the perfect anthem for the underdog Mets
- 'Survivor' Season 47, Episode 5: A castaway was blindsided by their tribe. Who went home?
- When do new episodes of 'The Lincoln Lawyer' come out? Season 3 release date, cast, how to watch
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Hundreds of troops kicked out under ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ get upgraded to honorable discharges
Ranking
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Many schools are still closed weeks after Hurricane Helene. Teachers worry about long-term impact
- Concerns for Ryan Day, Georgia and Alabama entering Week 7. College Football Fix discusses
- What’s behind the widening gender wage gap in the US?
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Another study points to correlation between helmet use on motorcycles and odds of survival
- Gap Outlet's Fall Favorites Sale Includes Cozy & Chic Puffers, Moto Jackets & More, Up to 70% Off
- Justice Department to monitor voting in Ohio county after sheriff’s comment about Harris supporters
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Mega Millions winning numbers for October 15 drawing: Did anyone win $169 million jackpot?
Under $50 Perfumes That Actually Smell Really Good
Opinion: Former NFL player Carl Nassib, three years after coming out, still changing lives
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Lonzo Ball makes triumphant return for first NBA game since Jan. 2022
Off-duty Detroit officer fatally shot after wounding 2 fellow officers, chief says
Hunter Biden revives lawsuit against Fox News over explicit images used in streaming series