Current:Home > MyMaryland Climate Ruling a Setback for Oil and Gas Industry -NextFrontier Finance
Maryland Climate Ruling a Setback for Oil and Gas Industry
View
Date:2025-04-28 01:37:12
A lawsuit for damages related to climate change brought by the city of Baltimore can be heard in Maryland state courts, a federal appeals court ruled on Friday. The decision is a setback for the fossil fuel industry, which had argued that the case should be heard in federal court, where rulings in previous climate cases have favored the industry.
In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the Fourth U.S. Circuit of Appeals dismissed the industry’s argument that the lawsuit was more appropriate for federal court because the damage claims should be weighed against federal laws and regulations that permitted the industry to extract oil and gas, the primary cause of the greenhouse gas emissions that drive global warming.
Pending any further appeals, the ruling leaves the door open for the case to proceed in a Maryland court, where the city is relying on state laws covering a number of violations, including public nuisance, product liability and consumer protection.
The court’s decision Friday is the first federal appeals court to rule in a string of climate cases under appeal across the country over the question of federal or state jurisdiction. It affirmed an earlier ruling by a lower federal court that the case was best heard in state court.
The ruling is not binding on other pending appeals, but legal scholars say that other federal appeals courts will take notice of the findings.
Although the ruling blocks one avenue of defense for the industry, the judges did not foreclose other possible challenges related to the question of jurisdiction. There was no immediate indication from the industry of whether further legal options might be considered or what those might be.
Baltimore’s top legal officer, acting City Solicitor Dana Moore, hailed the ruling as a rebuke to the industry.
“We were confident in our case and are grateful that the Court of Appeals agreed,” Moore said in a prepared statement. “We look forward to having a jury hear the facts about the fossil fuel companies’ decades-long campaign of deception and their attempt to make Baltimore’s residents, workers, and businesses pay for all the climate damage they’ve knowingly caused.”
The foundation for the appeals court ruling was laid last year when lawyers representing the city argued before the appeals court that the foundation of the case rested on the promotion of a harmful product by the fossil fuel industry. That equated to violations of state product liability laws best decided by state courts, the city’s lawyers argued.
The essence of the fossil fuel companies’ argument was that much of the oil and gas was extracted from federal land under permits issued by the federal government so the allegations must be resolved under federal law.
Ann Carlson, an environmental law professor at the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, part of the University of California, Los Angeles’ School of Law, said the ruling is significant because it steamrolls one of the primary roadblocks used by the industry in an attempt to block the city’s day in court.
“This ruling removes an obstacle to the plaintiffs moving forward in state courts and puts these cases much, much closer to a trial where the facts and the truth will emerge,” said Carlson, who has done limited pro bono work on the Baltimore case.
Carlson called the ruling “well-reasoned” and “solid,” so that other appellate courts considering similar climate cases could take notice.
“There could be some influence,” she said. “The issues are much the same and this ruling could provide some guidance to the other courts.”
The Baltimore case, filed two years ago, seeks to hold 26 fossil fuel companies financially accountable for the threats posed by climate change. The lawsuit alleges that fossil fuel companies, including Exxon, Chevron and Phillips 66, knowingly sold dangerous products for decades and failed to take steps to reduce that harm.
Baltimore’s lawsuit claims that the 26 companies are responsible for approximately 15 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions in the five decades from 1965 to 2015.
Among the consequences of that increase in atmospheric carbon have been extreme weather events and sea level rise, both particular threats to Baltimore.
“As a direct and proximate consequence of defendants’ wrongful conduct … flooding and storms will become more frequent and more severe, and average sea level will rise substantially along Maryland’s coast, including in Baltimore,” the city argued in its suit.
The Baltimore case joins more than a dozen lawsuits—including claims filed by the state of Rhode Island and cities and counties in California, Colorado, New York and Washington State—that are currently pending to hold fossil fuel companies financially accountable for their role in creating climate change and for deceiving the public about the impact of their business practices.
The industry is trying to steer the climate cases into the federal courts, where the U.S. Supreme Court could ultimately end up ruling on the issue.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- More than a meal: Restaurant-based programs feed seniors’ social lives
- New Mexico reports man in Valencia County is first West Nile virus fatality of the year
- Spectrum Cable can't show these college football games amid ESPN dispute
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- What to know about COVID as hospitalizations go up and some places bring back masks
- Russian students are returning to school, where they face new lessons to boost their patriotism
- 5 former employees at Georgia juvenile detention facility indicted in 16-year-old girl’s 2022 death
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Why Wishbone Kitchen TikToker Meredith Hayden Is Stepping Away From Being a Private Chef
Ranking
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Rudy Giuliani pleads not guilty to charges in Georgia election case
- Proud Boy who smashed Capitol window on Jan. 6 gets 10 years in prison, then declares, ‘Trump won!’
- What Jalen Milroe earning starting QB job for season opener means for Alabama football
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Americans have long wanted the perfect endless summer. Jimmy Buffett offered them one
- 10 years and 1,000 miles later, Bob the cat is finally on his way back home
- Jobs report: 187,000 jobs added in August as unemployment rises to 3.8%
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Russia says it thwarted attacks on Crimea bridge, which was briefly closed for a third time
Man who escaped Oregon mental hospital while shackled found stuck in muddy pond
Pakistani traders strike countrywide against high inflation and utility bills
NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
UN chief is globetrotting to four major meetings before the gathering of world leaders in September
Upset alert for Clemson, North Carolina? College football bold predictions for Week 1
Midwestern 'paradise for outdoor enthusiasts': See Indiana's most unique estate for sale