Current:Home > NewsRegulators approve plans for new Georgia Power plants driven by rising demand -NextFrontier Finance
Regulators approve plans for new Georgia Power plants driven by rising demand
View
Date:2025-04-17 01:11:39
ATLANTA (AP) — Utility regulators on Tuesday approved a plan for Georgia Power Co. to expand a power plant southwest of Atlanta.
The Georgia Public Service Commission voted 5-0 for the unit of Atlanta-based Southern Co. to build three new fossil-fuel burning units at Plant Yates, near Newnan.
The company has declined to say how much it will spend on the plants, which will burn either natural gas or diesel fuel to generate electricity, but commission staff members have said similar recent plants in other states have cost $800 million or more.
The commission greenlighted building the plants in April, when it approved a special plan to add generating capacity because the utility said demand was increasing more rapidly than previous projections, driven in part by a boom in computer data centers locating in Georgia. The company won permission to build the units itself, without seeking outside bids for electrical generation, because its projections show it needs more electricity by the end 2026.
“Simply put, we need to build these units and we need to build them now,” Georgia Power lawyer Steve Hewitson told commissioners Thursday during a committee meeting.
Normally, commissioners approve long-term generating and rate plans for Georgia Power once every three years, but this approval came mid-cycle. Because the regular generating and rate plans will be up for consideration next year, customers will see no change in bills because of Plant Yates until 2026.
Georgia Power customers have seen their bills rise sharply in recent years because of higher natural gas costs, the cost of construction projects, including two new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle near Augusta, and other factors. A typical Georgia Power residential customer now pays more than $173 a month, including taxes.
Environmentalists and customer advocates questioned letting Georgia Power build new fossil fuel plants without going through a competitive process. Using those sources would mean Georgia Power emits more climate-altering carbon dioxide than using solar generation, other renewable sources and conservation.
They also argue that it leaves customers more exposed to the risk of rising natural gas costs, which have been a big ingredient in recent bill increases. The units would mostly run on natural gas but would switch to diesel when electrical demand is at peak and more natural gas can’t be purchased or delivered by pipeline.
Curt Thompson, a lawyer representing the Sierra Club and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, argued Thursday that Georgia Power should bear some of the risks of rising natural gas costs. In Georgia, the company has been allowed to pass through the entire costs of fuel for its plants, including the combustion turbines it wants to build at Yates.
“The utility industry in general and Georgia Power, in particular, have become increasingly reliant on gas,” Thompson said. “The Yates CTs would only deepen that gas addiction.”
Opponents had again asked the commission to wait until it could examine bids to provide generation, even though commissioners had approved the Yates plan in April
“Those resources may well be cheaper, cleaner, and a better fit for Georgia Power customers,” Thompson said,
Georgia Power agreed it wouldn’t charge for cost overruns for the turbines unless they are caused by factors outside the company’s “reasonable control.” It’s supposed to submit reports on construction progress every six months.
veryGood! (5313)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- In Georgia, Warnock’s Climate Activism Contrasts Sharply with Walker’s Deep Skepticism
- Great Scott! 30 Secrets About Back to the Future Revealed
- Pregnant Rihanna, A$AP Rocky and Son RZA Chill Out in Barbados
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- FERC Says it Will Consider Greenhouse Gas Emissions and ‘Environmental Justice’ Impacts in Approving New Natural Gas Pipelines
- Warming Trends: Weather Guarantees for Your Vacation, Plus the Benefits of Microbial Proteins and an Urban Bias Against the Environment
- NBC's late night talk show staff get pay and benefits during writers strike
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Why the Chesapeake Bay’s Beloved Blue Crabs Are at an All-Time Low
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Warming Trends: Chilling in a Heat Wave, Healthy Food Should Eat Healthy Too, Breeding Delays for Wild Dogs, and Three Days of Climate Change in Song
- Plagued by Daily Blackouts, Puerto Ricans Are Calling for an Energy Revolution. Will the Biden Administration Listen?
- Well, It's Still Pride Is Reason Enough To Buy These 25 Rainbow Things
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- When the Power Goes Out, Who Suffers? Climate Epidemiologists Are Now Trying to Figure That Out
- Activists Laud Biden’s New Environmental Justice Appointee, But Concerns Linger Over Equity and Funding
- Check Out the Most Surprising Celeb Transformations of the Week
Recommendation
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
Little Miss Sunshine's Alan Arkin Dead at 89
Indian Court Rules That Nature Has Legal Status on Par With Humans—and That Humans Are Required to Protect It
The Year in Climate Photos
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Precision agriculture technology helps farmers - but they need help
With Biden in Europe Promising to Expedite U.S. LNG Exports, Environmentalists on the Gulf Coast Say, Not So Fast
In North Carolina Senate Race, Global Warming Is On The Back Burner. Do Voters Even Care?